Rating Migration and Bond Valuation: Towards Ahistorical Rating Migration Matrices and Default Probability Term Structures

Brian Barnard


The study examines rating migration, and default probability term structures obtained from rating migration matrices. It expands on the use of rating migration matrices with reduced form bond valuation models, by formally delineating the probability of default according to the likely rating paths of a bond, as implied by the rating migration matrix. Further, two alternatives are also considered. First, the cost of default is stipulated as the recovery of par according to the exit rating upon default. Also, in addition to stating the value of a bond in terms of expected cash flows, when considering the probability of default, the value of a bond is alternatively stated as the present value of all likely rating paths of the bond, discounted against the market risk-bearing bond forward rates of the different rating categories. The impact of term structure volatility and rating migration uncertainty on bond valuation is also considered.

It is shown that the relationship between rating migration and default probability is complex, and the default probabilities of different rating categories are time-dependent and not isolated from each other. Also, rating migration resembles a delayed default process that influences default probabilities of subsequent intervals. The implications of a rating migration matrix may perhaps only be fully understood through simulation. This form one of the first points by which to evaluate rating migration matrices. The results of the valuation model show that historical rating migration matrices may not be optimal for pricing bonds ahistorically. A principal premise of the study is the dichotomy between historical values and ahistorical estimates, particularly with regards to rating migration. It is argued that historical estimates face two key shortcomings: they must be able to accurately forecast future rating migration and rating category intensities as a result, and they must specify a method to include rating migration uncertainty. An optimization model is delineated to extract ahistorical rating migration matrices from market prices. This too has implications that should be considered. In light of the above, reduced form models may have an advantage over structural models, in their ability to portray a far more sophisticated default process.

Full Text:


DOI: https://doi.org/10.11114/afa.v5i1.2157


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Paper Submission E-mail: afa@redfame.com

Applied Finance and Accounting (AFA)        

ISSN 2374-2410(Print)           ISSN 2374-2429(Online)

Copyright © Redfame Publishing Inc.

To make sure that you can receive messages from us, please add the 'redfame.com' domain to your e-mail 'safe list'. If you do not receive e-mail in your 'inbox', check your 'bulk mail' or 'junk mail' folders. If you have any questions, please contact: afa@redfame.com